Search for: "Sound Testing, Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Otherwise the sound prediction may be satisfied with secret inhouse tests or publicly available material. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:21 am
In re Nash Studio Inc., Serial No. 79284379 (May 27, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:39 am
Health Partners, Inc., pays $25,000 to settle an Americans WIth Disabilities Act ("ADA") lawsuit. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 11:17 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2104 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:15 pm
"As to functionality, the Board applied both the Supreme Court test set out in Qualitex, quoting Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Well, let's put that theory to the test with the four Section 2(d) appeals set out below. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 12:20 am
Townsend Farms, Inc. has notified Costco that a recent FDA test indicated that a domestic conventional frozen blackberry product manufactured by Townsend Farms, Inc., may be contaminated with Hepatitis A. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:01 am
Merrick Pet Care, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:05 am
In re ISCA Technologies, Inc., Serial No. 87321402 (April 24, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw).The Board took only six pages to affirm the refusal. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:44 pm
Havner added the requirements that the underlying data must accurate and the methodology sound. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:46 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Asept Air, Inc. , Serial No. 88265476 (January 6, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
First, plaintiff's claims sounded in copyright regardless of whether the Court used the "face of the complaint" test or the "principal and controlling issue" test both of which have been used by the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
Of course, the presence of the wording JUICE INC. is a point of difference.Registrant's mark has no sound, whereas the sound of JUICE INC. is a point of difference.As to meaning, the unusual idea of a combination of fruit with an ice cube in both marks constitutes a "substantial degree of similarity in meaning. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:57 am
Google Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:02 am
StonCor Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Nathan granted in part defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff TufAmerica, Inc.' [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 3:10 am
Favazza's, Inc., Opposition No. 91210050 (February 16, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:19 am
Therefore its applied-for sound marks are not inherently distinctive.Powermat's advertising evidence and its (usupported) argument that the sounds were developed by a professional composer and market-tested, could not change the result here. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:36 pm
The if-it-takes-more-than-one-breath test. [read post]
